Skip to content

Product managers and researchers

Leave the interviewwith something you did not know.

A user interview goes wrong quietly. You ask the user to agree with you, they oblige, and you leave with a validated belief you walked in holding. That is visible in the transcript and almost never visible in the room.

Apple Silicon  ·  free forever for individuals  ·  no account  ·  v0.1.9

User interviews, coached while you run them

What it saysin the moment

Cues arrive during the call, and a cue that cannot point at the line in the transcript it is reacting to is discarded in the backend before it reaches you. These are the shape of the ones that survive.

  • That was a leading question. Ask what they did last time instead of whether they would use it

  • They asked for a dashboard. Nothing yet on what they do with the number once they have it

  • You have confirmed the belief you arrived with twice and tested it zero times

  • A workaround was described in passing and never priced

Live signals

The scores that move as the call moves

Pain intensity
How much this actually costs them, not how much they say it annoys them
Requirement clarity
Whether what they want is now specific enough to build
User urgency
Would they change anything about their week over it
Workflow understanding
How much of the surrounding process you now know
Feature relevance
Whether the thing they asked for addresses the thing they described

The scorecard afterwards

Five dimensions, each with its quote

Problem probing
Did you dig into the workflow behind the request, or take the feature ask at face value?
Listening
Did you let the user describe the problem in their own words?
Testing assumptions
Did you check a belief you walked in with, or only confirm it?
Non-leading questions
Did you ask what happened, or ask the user to agree with you?
Next step
Is there a concrete follow-up, a doc or a prototype or another session, with a date?

A dimension the call never tested is left unscored rather than quietly given a zero, because a zero you did not earn teaches you nothing.

About 40 seconds after you hang up

The review, on one screen

A scored rubric, a verdict and the one next step that matters. Everything else is a tile you open, and the page underneath never moves.

Post-meeting brief
The post-meeting brief: rubric scores, the verdict, the one next step, and four tiles waiting to be opened
One screen, no scrolling. It reads the whole transcript, not the last few minutes that happen to fit in a context window.

Tell it what you are trying to achieve

Name what you are trying to find out and it will notice when you stop trying to find it out.

You pick one of these when you set the meeting up. It becomes the thing the call is measured against, and the reason a cue can say you have not got there yet:

  • Extract user pain points
  • Discover requirements
  • Concept or prototype feedback
  • Churn or cancellation interview
  • Stakeholder alignment on scope

What it is not

It does not synthesise across interviews or build an insight repository. It works one conversation at a time.

Free, and it takes two minutes

No account, no card, no bot in your next call. Download it and run one meeting through it.

Apple Silicon  ·  free forever for individuals  ·  no account  ·  v0.1.9