Skip to content

Recruiting and talent

Interviews scored on how you ran them, not on the candidateso the panel compares notes, not memories.

Structured hiring falls apart at the point where two interviewers ask two different sets of questions and both write down a strong yes. That gap is visible in a transcript and invisible in the room.

Apple Silicon  ·  free forever for individuals  ·  no account  ·  v0.1.9

Why this is awkward here

Candidate audio is personal data in every jurisdiction that has an opinion about it, which makes a cloud recorder a live question for your privacy notice. With the on-device engines the recording never reaches anybody.

Where it earns its place

The calls it changes

Set what the call is supposed to achieve before it starts, and the cues are about your call rather than about calls in general.

First screens

Did the candidate do most of the talking, as they should?

Craft deep dives

Did you get past the CV story to a specific thing this person actually did?

Debriefs

The same substantive questions a comparable candidate would get, or improvised?

Closing calls

Was the role framed around what this candidate said they wanted?

It scores the interviewer. It does not rank candidates, and it is not an ATS.

The part that makes it usable as evidence

Every score carriesthe sentence that earned it

A score you cannot check is an opinion. Click any dimension and it opens the reason and the exact line from the transcript that produced it.

Every score carries its evidence
Clicking a rubric score opens the reason for it and the exact line from the transcript that earned it

Free, and it takes two minutes

No account, no card, no bot in your next call. Download it and run one meeting through it.

Apple Silicon  ·  free forever for individuals  ·  no account  ·  v0.1.9